![]() ![]() ![]() To test the fast functioning of the juicer, we cored three red apples into quarters (we used organic gala apples for this round of testing). We collected apples, oranges and kale and tested these juicers with a variety of produce textures. Black + Decker: This juicer was our worst performance, but it’s an affordable way to try juice for only $ 40.Cuisinart CJE-1000: This looks good, but it slows down performance.Mueller Austria: This 1,100 watt juicer was too average in performance to guarantee a price of $ 150.Vagot DB-001: For just $ 60, this juicer is a budget model that can get the job done.I’ve stepped into something as expensive as $ 149, but if you’ve seen it for sale, that’s a good bet. ![]() Kuvings NJ Series Centrifugal Juicer: This juice was third in terms of juice extraction.The above three juicers performed best, but we tested a total of eight juicers. If it is for sale, we would be happy if we could provide a permanent home on the countertop. I didn’t get the best results (Oster is now four-eighths), but it was fun to use. Illuminated speed dials add to the sophistication of this model. JusSimple also features a wide 3-inch mouth, which reduces the need to chop the juicer to match the produce. Convenient rotating spouts in open and closed positions prevent juice from dripping from the feed chute onto the countertop. The sporty red coating on the filter is easier to clean than the uncoated metal model. Oster’s Jus Simple Juicer wins the best design. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |